Home  ›  To Say I Love You Is Something Else Again Image

To Say I Love You Is Something Else Again Image

Written By Tuesday, May 17, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Emotion

Love encompasses a range of strong and positive emotional and mental states, from the most sublime virtue or good habit, the deepest interpersonal affection, to the simplest pleasure.[one] [2] An example of this range of meanings is that the love of a mother differs from the love of a spouse, which differs from the love for food. Nearly commonly, love refers to a feeling of a strong attraction and emotional attachment.[3] [4] [ additional citation(south) needed ]

Love is considered to be both positive and negative, with its virtue representing human kindness, compassion, and affection, as "the unselfish loyal and chivalrous business concern for the proficient of another" and its vice representing human moral flaw, akin to vanity, selfishness, amour-propre, and egotism, as potentially leading people into a type of mania, obsessiveness or codependency.[five] [6] It may also describe compassionate and affectionate actions towards other humans, one'south cocky, or animals.[7] In its various forms, dearest acts as a major facilitator of interpersonal relationships and, owing to its central psychological importance, is one of the most common themes in the creative arts.[8] Love has been postulated to be a function that keeps human beings together confronting menaces and to facilitate the continuation of the species.[nine]

Ancient Greek philosophers identified 6 forms of love: essentially, familial honey (in Greek, Storge ), friendly love or platonic love ( Philia ), romantic love ( Eros ), self-dear ( Philautia ), guest love ( Xenia ), and divine love ( Agape ). Mod authors accept distinguished further varieties of dearest: unrequited beloved, empty love, companionate love, consummate love, infatuated love, self-honey, and courtly honey. Numerous cultures have besides distinguished Ren , Yuanfen , Mamihlapinatapai , Cafuné , Kama , Bhakti , Mettā , Ishq , Chesed , Amore , Charity , Saudade (and other variants or symbioses of these states), every bit culturally unique words, definitions, or expressions of love in regards to a specified "moments" currently defective in the English language.[x] [11] [12]

Scientific enquiry on emotion has increased significantly over the past two decades. The color cycle theory of love defines three primary, three secondary and ix 3rd honey styles, describing them in terms of the traditional color wheel. The triangular theory of love suggests "intimacy, passion and commitment" are core components of love. Dearest has boosted religious or spiritual meaning. This diversity of uses and meanings combined with the complexity of the feelings involved makes love unusually difficult to consistently define, compared to other emotional states.

Definitions

Romeo and Juliet, depicted equally they part on the balustrade in Act 3, 1867 by Ford Madox Brown

The word "love" can accept a variety of related but singled-out meanings in different contexts. Many other languages employ multiple words to express some of the different concepts that in English are denoted as "love"; one instance is the plurality of Greek concepts for "love" (agape, eros, philia, storge) .[thirteen] Cultural differences in conceptualizing dear thus doubly impede the establishment of a universal definition.[xiv]

Although the nature or essence of love is a subject of frequent debate, dissimilar aspects of the word can be clarified past determining what isn't love (antonyms of "love"). Love as a general expression of positive sentiment (a stronger form of like) is usually assorted with hate (or neutral aloofness). Equally a less-sexual and more-emotionally intimate course of romantic attachment, love is commonly contrasted with lust. Equally an interpersonal relationship with romantic overtones, love is sometimes contrasted with friendship, although the word love is often applied to close friendships or platonic honey. (Further possible ambiguities come with usages "girlfriend", "boyfriend", "just good friends").

Abstractly discussed, love usually refers to an experience i person feels for some other. Love often involves caring for, or identifying with, a person or thing (cf. vulnerability and intendance theory of dear), including oneself (cf. narcissism). In addition to cantankerous-cultural differences in understanding dearest, ideas about honey have also changed greatly over fourth dimension. Some historians date modern conceptions of romantic love to courtly Europe during or after the Middle Ages, although the prior existence of romantic attachments is attested by aboriginal dearest poetry.[15]

The complex and abstract nature of dearest often reduces soapbox of dear to a thought-terminating cliche. Several common proverbs regard love, from Virgil'southward "Love conquers all" to The Beatles' "All You Demand Is Dearest". St. Thomas Aquinas, post-obit Aristotle, defines love as "to volition the good of another."[16] Bertrand Russell describes beloved equally a status of "absolute value," equally opposed to relative value.[ citation needed ] Philosopher Gottfried Leibniz said that love is "to be delighted by the happiness of another."[17] Meher Baba stated that in dearest there is a "feeling of unity" and an "agile appreciation of the intrinsic worth of the object of love."[eighteen] Biologist Jeremy Griffith defines love as "unconditional selflessness".[19]

Impersonal

People can be said to love an object, principle, or goal to which they are deeply committed and profoundly value. For instance, compassionate outreach and volunteer workers' "honey" of their cause may sometimes exist born not of interpersonal dear only impersonal love, altruism, and strong spiritual or political convictions.[20] People can also "love" material objects, animals, or activities if they invest themselves in bonding or otherwise identifying with those things. If sexual passion is likewise involved, and so this feeling is called paraphilia.[21]

Interpersonal

Interpersonal dearest refers to beloved betwixt homo beings. Information technology is a much more stiff sentiment than a elementary liking for a person. Unrequited love refers to those feelings of love that are not reciprocated. Interpersonal honey is most closely associated with Interpersonal relationships.[xx] Such love might exist between family unit members, friends, and couples. There are too a number of psychological disorders related to love, such equally erotomania. Throughout history, philosophy and religion have washed the nigh speculation on the miracle of love. In the 20th century, the science of psychology has written a groovy bargain on the subject area. In recent years, the sciences of psychology, anthropology, neuroscience, and biology have added to the understanding of the concept of beloved.

Biological footing

Biological models of sex tend to view dear as a mammalian drive, much like hunger or thirst.[22] Helen Fisher, an anthropologist and human being behavior researcher, divides the feel of dear into three partly overlapping stages: animalism, attraction, and attachment. Lust is the feeling of sexual want; romantic allure determines what partners mates find attractive and pursue, conserving fourth dimension and energy by choosing; and attachment involves sharing a dwelling house, parental duties, common defense force, and in humans involves feelings of prophylactic and security.[23] Three distinct neural circuitries, including neurotransmitters, and three behavioral patterns, are associated with these iii romantic styles.[23]

Pair of Lovers. 1480–1485

Lust is the initial passionate sexual desire that promotes mating, and involves the increased release of chemicals such as testosterone and estrogen. These furnishings rarely terminal more than than a few weeks or months. Attraction is the more individualized and romantic desire for a specific candidate for mating, which develops out of animalism as commitment to an private mate forms. Recent studies in neuroscience accept indicated that as people autumn in love, the encephalon consistently releases a sure set of chemicals, including the neurotransmitter hormones, dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin, the same compounds released by amphetamine, stimulating the brain's pleasure eye and leading to side furnishings such every bit increased center rate, loss of appetite and slumber, and an intense feeling of excitement. Research has indicated that this stage by and large lasts from one and a one-half to three years.[24]

Since the lust and allure stages are both considered temporary, a third stage is needed to business relationship for long-term relationships. Attachment is the bonding that promotes relationships lasting for many years and even decades. Attachment is generally based on commitments such as union and children, or mutual friendship based on things similar shared interests. It has been linked to higher levels of the chemicals oxytocin and vasopressin to a greater degree than brusk-term relationships take.[24] Enzo Emanuele and coworkers reported the protein molecule known as the nerve growth gene (NGF) has high levels when people starting time fall in love, but these return to previous levels after one twelvemonth.[25]

Psychological basis

Psychology depicts love equally a cognitive and social miracle. Psychologist Robert Sternberg formulated a triangular theory of love and argued that love has iii unlike components: intimacy, commitment, and passion. Intimacy is a form in which two people share confidences and diverse details of their personal lives, and is usually shown in friendships and romantic love affairs. Commitment, on the other mitt, is the expectation that the relationship is permanent. The terminal form of dearest is sexual attraction and passion. Passionate love is shown in infatuation every bit well as romantic dear. All forms of beloved are viewed equally varying combinations of these three components. Non-dear does not include whatever of these components. Liking only includes intimacy. Infatuated love only includes passion. Empty love only includes commitment. Romantic dear includes both intimacy and passion. Companionate love includes intimacy and commitment. Fatuous love includes passion and delivery. Lastly, consummate love includes all three components.[26] American psychologist Zick Rubin sought to define love past psychometrics in the 1970s. His work states that three factors constitute dearest: attachment, caring, and intimacy.[27] [28]

Following developments in electric theories such as Coulomb's law, which showed that positive and negative charges attract, analogs in homo life were adult, such as "opposites concenter". Over the last century, inquiry on the nature of man mating has generally plant this non to be truthful when it comes to character and personality—people tend to like people similar to themselves. However, in a few unusual and specific domains, such equally allowed systems, it seems that humans adopt others who are unlike themselves (east.chiliad., with an orthogonal immune system), since this will lead to a baby that has the all-time of both worlds.[29] In recent years, various homo bonding theories have been developed, described in terms of attachments, ties, bonds, and affinities. Some Western government disaggregate into two main components, the donating and the narcissistic. This view is represented in the works of Scott Peck, whose work in the field of practical psychology explored the definitions of love and evil. Peck maintains that love is a combination of the "business for the spiritual growth of some other," and simple narcissism.[thirty] In combination, honey is an activity, not but a feeling.

Psychologist Erich Fromm maintained in his book The Art of Loving that dear is not merely a feeling but is likewise deportment, and that in fact, the "feeling" of beloved is superficial in comparison to i's commitment to love via a serial of loving deportment over time.[twenty] In this sense, Fromm held that love is ultimately not a feeling at all, only rather is a commitment to, and adherence to, loving actions towards another, oneself, or many others, over a sustained duration.[20] Fromm too described love as a witting pick that in its early stages might originate equally an involuntary feeling, but which and then after no longer depends on those feelings, just rather depends just on witting commitment.[20]

Evolutionary basis

Wall of Love on Montmartre in Paris: "I dear yous" in 250 languages, by calligraphist Fédéric Baron and artist Claire Kito (2000)

Evolutionary psychology has attempted to provide diverse reasons for honey as a survival tool. Humans are dependent on parental help for a large portion of their lifespans compared to other mammals. Love has therefore been seen every bit a machinery to promote parental support of children for this extended fourth dimension period. Furthermore, researchers as early equally Charles Darwin himself identified unique features of homo dear compared to other mammals and credit dear every bit a major factor for creating social support systems that enabled the evolution and expansion of the human species.[31] Another factor may exist that sexually transmitted diseases can cause, among other effects, permanently reduced fertility, injury to the fetus, and increase complications during childbirth. This would favor monogamous relationships over polygamy.[32]

Adaptive benefit

Interpersonal beloved between a male and a female is considered to provide an evolutionary adaptive benefit since information technology facilitates mating and sexual reproduction.[33] Yet, some organisms can reproduce asexually without mating. Thus understanding the adaptive benefit of interpersonal love depends on understanding the adaptive benefit of sexual reproduction as opposed to asexual reproduction. Michod[33] has reviewed prove that love, and consequently sexual reproduction, provides two major adaptive advantages. First, love leading to sexual reproduction facilitates repair of amercement in the DNA that is passed from parent to progeny (during meiosis, a primal stage of the sexual process). Second, a gene in either parent may comprise a harmful mutation, but in the progeny produced by sex reproduction, expression of a harmful mutation introduced past one parent is likely to be masked past expression of the unaffected homologous gene from the other parent.[33]

Comparison of scientific models

Biological models of love tend to see it equally a mammalian bulldoze, similar to hunger or thirst.[22] Psychology sees love as more of a social and cultural phenomenon. Certainly, dearest is influenced by hormones (such every bit oxytocin), neurotrophins (such as NGF), and pheromones, and how people think and behave in love is influenced by their conceptions of love. The conventional view in biology is that there are two major drives in love: sexual allure and zipper. Attachment between adults is presumed to work on the same principles that lead an infant to become attached to its mother. The traditional psychological view sees dear equally being a combination of companionate love and passionate beloved. Passionate love is intense longing, and is often accompanied by physiological arousal (shortness of breath, rapid eye rate); companionate dear is affection and a feeling of intimacy not accompanied by physiological arousal.

Cultural views

Ancient Greek

Roman re-create of a Greek sculpture by Lysippus depicting Eros, the Greek personification of romantic honey

Greek distinguishes several different senses in which the word "love" is used. Ancient Greeks identified four forms of love: kinship or familiarity (in Greek, storge), friendship and/or platonic desire (philia), sexual and/or romantic want (eros), and self-emptying or divine love (afraid).[34] [35] Modern authors have distinguished further varieties of romantic love.[36] Withal, with Greek (as with many other languages), it has been historically hard to carve up the meanings of these words totally. At the aforementioned time, the Ancient Greek text of the Bible has examples of the verb agapo having the aforementioned pregnant as phileo.

Afraid ( ἀγάπη agápē) means love in modernistic-day Greek. The term due south'agapo means I beloved you in Greek. The give-and-take agapo is the verb I love. It generally refers to a "pure," platonic blazon of love, rather than the physical attraction suggested by eros. However, there are some examples of agape used to mean the same every bit eros. It has also been translated as "love of the soul."[37]

Eros ( ἔρως érōs) (from the Greek deity Eros) is passionate beloved, with sensual want and longing. The Greek word erota means in dear. Plato refined his own definition. Although eros is initially felt for a person, with contemplation it becomes an appreciation of the beauty within that person, or even becomes appreciation of dazzler itself. Eros helps the soul recall cognition of beauty and contributes to an understanding of spiritual truth. Lovers and philosophers are all inspired to seek truth by eros. Some translations list it as "love of the body".[37]

Philia ( φιλία philía), a dispassionate virtuous love, was a concept addressed and developed by Aristotle in his Nicomachean Ideals Volume Viii.[38] It includes loyalty to friends, family, and community, and requires virtue, equality, and familiarity. Philia is motivated by practical reasons; one or both of the parties do good from the relationship. It can also mean "honey of the heed."

Storge ( στοργή storgē) is natural affection, like that felt by parents for offspring.

Xenia (ξενία xenía), hospitality, was an extremely of import exercise in ancient Greece. It was an nearly ritualized friendship formed betwixt a host and his guest, who could previously take been strangers. The host fed and provided quarters for the guest, who was expected to repay only with gratitude. The importance of this can be seen throughout Greek mythology—in item, Homer's Iliad and Odyssey.

Ancient Roman (Latin)

The Latin language has several different verbs respective to the English word "love." amō is the basic verb meaning I dearest, with the infinitive amare ("to love") as information technology however is in Italian today. The Romans used it both in an appreciating sense as well every bit in a romantic or sexual sense. From this verb come amans—a lover, amator, "professional lover," oftentimes with the accessory notion of lechery—and amica, "girlfriend" in the English sense, ofttimes being practical euphemistically to a prostitute. The corresponding noun is amor (the significance of this term for the Romans is well illustrated in the fact, that the name of the city, Rome—in Latin: Roma—can be viewed every bit an anagram for amor, which was used equally the secret name of the City in wide circles in ancient times),[39] which is besides used in the plural course to indicate love affairs or sexual adventures. This same root also produces amicus—"friend"—and amicitia, "friendship" (oftentimes based to mutual advantage, and corresponding sometimes more closely to "indebtedness" or "influence"). Cicero wrote a treatise called On Friendship (de Amicitia), which discusses the notion at some length. Ovid wrote a guide to dating called Ars Amatoria (The Art of Love), which addresses, in depth, everything from extramarital affairs to overprotective parents.

Latin sometimes uses amāre where English would simply say to like. This notion, however, is much more mostly expressed in Latin by the terms placere or delectāre, which are used more than colloquially, the latter used frequently in the love poetry of Catullus. Diligere oftentimes has the notion "to be affectionate for," "to esteem," and rarely if ever is used for romantic love. This word would be appropriate to describe the friendship of two men. The corresponding noun diligentia, all the same, has the meaning of "diligence" or "carefulness," and has fiddling semantic overlap with the verb. Observare is a synonym for diligere; despite the cognate with English, this verb and its corresponding substantive, observantia, often announce "esteem" or "affection." Caritas is used in Latin translations of the Christian Bible to mean "charitable love"; this meaning, all the same, is not constitute in Classical infidel Roman literature. Every bit it arises from a conflation with a Greek word, at that place is no respective verb.

Chinese and other Sinic

Two philosophical underpinnings of love exist in the Chinese tradition, 1 from Confucianism which emphasized actions and duty while the other came from Mohism which championed a universal dearest. A cadre concept to Confucianism is 仁 (Ren, "benevolent love"), which focuses on duty, activity, and mental attitude in a relationship rather than love itself. In Confucianism, one displays chivalrous love by performing deportment such equally filial piety from children, kindness from parents, loyalty to the king and so forth.

The concept of 愛 (Standard mandarin: ài) was developed by the Chinese philosopher Mozi in the 4th century BC in reaction to Confucianism'due south chivalrous dear. Mozi tried to supervene upon what he considered to be the long-entrenched Chinese over-attachment to family and clan structures with the concept of "universal love" ( 兼愛 , jiān'ài). In this, he argued directly against Confucians who believed that it was natural and correct for people to care about different people in dissimilar degrees. Mozi, past contrast, believed people in principle should treat all people equally. Mohism stressed that rather than adopting different attitudes towards dissimilar people, love should be unconditional and offered to everyone without regard to reciprocation; not simply to friends, family and other Confucian relations. Later in Chinese Buddhism, the term Ai ( 愛 ) was adopted to refer to a passionate, caring dearest and was considered a key desire. In Buddhism, Ai was seen every bit capable of being either selfish or selfless, the latter existence a fundamental element towards enlightenment.

In Mandarin Chinese, 愛 (ài) is often used as the equivalent of the Western concept of love. 愛 (ài) is used as both a verb (e.m. 我愛你 , Wǒ ài nǐ, or "I love you") and a substantive (such equally 愛情 àiqíng, or "romantic dear"). However, due to the influence of Confucian 仁 (rén), the phrase 我愛你 (Wǒ ài nǐ, I love you) carries with it a very specific sense of responsibility, delivery and loyalty. Instead of frequently saying "I beloved you" every bit in some Western societies, the Chinese are more than likely to limited feelings of affection in a more casual fashion. Consequently, "I like y'all" ( 我喜欢你 , Wǒ xǐhuan nǐ) is a more than common style of expressing affection in Mandarin; it is more playful and less serious.[forty] This is also true in Japanese (suki da, 好きだ ).

Japanese

The Japanese linguistic communication uses iii words to convey the English language equivalent of "love". Considering "dearest" covers a wide range of emotions and behavioral phenomena, there are nuances distinguishing the three terms.[41] [42] The term ai ( 愛 ), which is often associated with maternal love[41] or selfless love,[42] originally referred to beauty and was often used in a religious context. Following the Meiji Restoration 1868, the term became associated with "love" in club to translate Western literature. Prior to Western influence, the term koi ( 恋 or 孤悲 ) mostly represented romantic love, and was often the field of study of the popular Human being'yōshū Japanese poesy collection.[41] Koi describes a longing for a member of the reverse sexual practice and is typically interpreted every bit selfish and wanting.[42] The term's origins come from the concept of lone confinement as a result of separation from a loved one. Though modern usage of koi focuses on sexual love and infatuation, the Manyō used the term to cover a wider range of situations, including tenderness, benevolence, and textile want.[41] The third term, ren'ai ( 恋愛 ), is a more modern construction that combines the kanji characters for both ai and koi, though its usage more than closely resembles that of koi in the course of romantic love.[41] [42]

Indian

The love stories of the Hindu deities Krishna and Radha have influenced the Indian culture and arts. Above: Radha Madhavam by Raja Ravi Varma.

In contemporary literature, the Sanskrit words for dearest is "sneha". Other terms such as Priya refers to innocent dearest, Prema refers to spiritual love, and Kama refers commonly to sexual desire.[43] [44] Even so, the term also refers to any sensory enjoyment, emotional attraction and artful pleasure such as from arts, dance, music, painting, sculpture and nature.[45] [46]

The concept of kama is found in some of the earliest known verses in Vedas. For example, Book ten of Rig Veda describes the cosmos of the universe from nothing by the smashing oestrus. In that location in hymn 129, it states:

कामस्तदग्रे समवर्तताधि मनसो रेतः परथमं यदासीत |
सतो बन्धुमसति निरविन्दन हर्दि परतीष्याकवयो मनीषा ||[47]

Thereafter rose Desire in the start, Desire the cardinal seed and germ of Spirit,
Sages who searched with their middle's thought discovered the existent's kinship in the non-existent.

Persian

The children of Adam are limbs of one body
Having been created of one essence.
When the calamity of time afflicts one limb
The other limbs cannot remain at remainder.
If you have no sympathy for the troubles of others
You are non worthy to be called past the name of "human being".

Sa'di, Gulistan

Rumi, Hafiz,and Sa'di are icons of the passion and love that the Western farsi culture and language nowadays.[ citation needed ] The Persian give-and-take for dear is Ishq, which is derived from Standard arabic linguistic communication; however, it is considered by most to be too stalwart a term for interpersonal love and is more than commonly substituted for "doost dashtan" ("liking").[ commendation needed ] In the Persian culture, everything is encompassed by love and all is for love, starting from loving friends and family, husbands and wives, and somewhen reaching the divine dear that is the ultimate goal in life.[ citation needed ]

Religious views

Abrahamic

Judaism

In Hebrew, אהבה (ahava) is the near commonly used term for both interpersonal honey and love between God and God's creations. Chesed, often translated every bit loving-kindness, is used to describe many forms of love betwixt human beings.

The commandment to love other people is given in the Torah, which states, "Honey your neighbor similar yourself" (Leviticus nineteen:eighteen). The Torah's commandment to love God "with all your heart, with all your soul and with all your might" (Deuteronomy 6:five) is taken by the Mishnah (a central text of the Jewish oral law) to refer to expert deeds, willingness to sacrifice one's life rather than commit certain serious transgressions, willingness to cede all of i's possessions, and beingness grateful to the Lord despite adversity (tractate Berachoth 9:5). Rabbinic literature differs every bit to how this beloved can be developed, e.g., past contemplating divine deeds or witnessing the marvels of nature.

As for love betwixt marital partners, this is deemed an essential ingredient to life: "Run across life with the married woman you lot dear" (Ecclesiastes 9:9). Rabbi David Wolpe writes that "...love is not only about the feelings of the lover...It is when i person believes in another person and shows it." He further states that "...love...is a feeling that expresses itself in action. What we actually feel is reflected in what we exercise."[49] The biblical book Song of Solomon is considered a romantically phrased metaphor of honey between God and his people, but in its plainly reading, reads like a love song. The 20th-century rabbi Eliyahu Eliezer Dessler is frequently quoted as defining love from the Jewish point of view as "giving without expecting to take" (from his Michtav me-Eliyahu, Vol. one).

Christianity

Dear and not a one-way street in romanticism

The Christian understanding is that love comes from God, who is himself Love (1 Jn 4:8). The love of homo and woman—eros in Greek—and the unselfish dear of others (afraid), are often contrasted as "descending" and "ascending" dear, respectively, but are ultimately the aforementioned thing.[50]

There are several Greek words for "love" that are regularly referred to in Christian circles.

  • Agape: In the New Testament, agapē is charitable, selfless, altruistic, and unconditional. It is parental love, seen as creating goodness in the globe; it is the fashion God is seen to love humanity, and it is seen as the kind of beloved that Christians aspire to have for i another.[37]
  • Phileo: Also used in the New Attestation, phileo is a man response to something that is found to be delightful. Too known as "brotherly love."
  • Two other words for love in the Greek language, eros (sexual love) and storge (child-to-parent love), were never used in the New Testament.[37]

Christians believe that to Love God with all your center, mind, and force and Love your neighbor as yourself are the two almost important things in life (the greatest commandment of the Jewish Torah, according to Jesus; cf. Gospel of Mark chapter 12, verses 28–34). Saint Augustine summarized this when he wrote "Beloved God, and do as thou wilt."

The Apostle Paul glorified beloved equally the most important virtue of all. Describing dearest in the famous poetic interpretation in 1 Corinthians, he wrote, "Honey is patient, honey is kind. Information technology does non envy, it does not avowal, it is non proud. It is not rude, it is non self-seeking, information technology is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil simply rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, and always perseveres." (1 Cor. 13:iv–7, NIV)

The Campaigner John wrote, "For God so loved the globe that he gave his one and simply Son, that whoever believes in him shall non perish merely have eternal life. For God did not send his Son into the earth to condemn the globe, but to relieve the world through him." (John 3:16–17, NIV) John also wrote, "Dear friends, let us love i another for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is honey." (i John four:7–8, NIV)

Saint Augustine wrote that one must be able to decipher the difference between love and lust. Lust, according to Saint Augustine, is an overindulgence, only to dearest and be loved is what he has sought for his entire life. He even says, "I was in love with dear." Finally, he does fall in honey and is loved dorsum, by God. Saint Augustine says the only one who can love y'all truly and fully is God, considering love with a human but allows for flaws such as "jealousy, suspicion, fear, anger, and contention." Co-ordinate to Saint Augustine, to love God is "to attain the peace which is yours." (Saint Augustine's Confessions)

Augustine regards the duplex commandment of love in Matthew 22 equally the heart of Christian faith and the interpretation of the Bible. After the review of Christian doctrine, Augustine treats the problem of honey in terms of utilize and enjoyment until the end of Volume I of De Doctrina Christiana (1.22.21–i.40.44;).[51]

Christian theologians see God as the source of love, which is mirrored in humans and their ain loving relationships. Influential Christian theologian C. S. Lewis wrote a book called The Iv Loves. Benedict Sixteen named his first encyclical God is love. He said that a human being being, created in the image of God, who is dear, is able to practice love; to requite himself to God and others (agape) and by receiving and experiencing God'southward beloved in contemplation (eros). This life of beloved, according to him, is the life of the saints such every bit Teresa of Calcutta and Mary, the mother of Jesus and is the direction Christians take when they believe that God loves them.[50]

Pope Francis taught that "True love is both loving and letting oneself exist loved...what is important in love is not our loving, but allowing ourselves to be loved by God."[52] And so, in the analysis of a Catholic theologian, for Pope Francis, "the key to dear...is not our activeness. Information technology is the activity of the greatest, and the source, of all the powers in the universe: God's."[53]

In Christianity the practical definition of beloved is summarised by Thomas Aquinas, who divers love as "to will the skilful of some other," or to desire for another to succeed.[16] This is an explanation of the Christian demand to love others, including their enemies. Every bit Thomas Aquinas explains, Christian love is motivated past the need to see others succeed in life, to exist good people.

Regarding love for enemies, Jesus is quoted in the Gospel of Matthew chapter five:

"Yous have heard that it was said, 'Dear your neighbor and hate your enemy.' Only I tell y'all, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you lot, that you may exist children of your Male parent in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the adept, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love y'all, what reward will you get? Are non even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your ain people, what are you doing more than others? Practise not even pagans practise that? Exist perfect, therefore, equally your heavenly Father is perfect." – Matthew 5: 43–48.

Do not forget to love with forgiveness, Christ saved an adulterous woman from those who would rock her. A world of wronged hypocrites needs forgiving dear. Mosaic Police would agree Deuteronomy 22:22-24 "If a human is establish lying with a woman married to a husband, so both of them shall die—the man that lay with the woman, and the woman; so you shall put away the evil from Israel. If a immature adult female who is a virgin is betrothed to a hubby, and a man finds her in the city and lies with her, then y'all shall bring them both out to the gate of that urban center, and yous shall stone them to expiry with stones, the young woman because she did not cry out in the city, and the man because he humbled his neighbor's wife; and then you shall put abroad the evil from amongst you."[54] [ circular reference ]

Tertullian wrote regarding love for enemies: "Our private, extraordinary, and perfect goodness consists in loving our enemies. To love ane's friends is common practise, to love one's enemies but among Christians."[55]

Islam

Al-Wadūd or The Loving is a name of God in Islam.

In Islam, one of the 99 names of God is Al-Wadūd , which means "The Loving"

Love encompasses the Islamic view of life as universal alliance that applies to all who hold faith. Among the 99 names of God (Allah), there is the name Al-Wadud, or "the Loving One," which is found in Surah [Quran 11:90] as well equally Surah [Quran 85:14]. God is besides referenced at the beginning of every chapter in the Qur'an as Ar-Rahman and Ar-Rahim, or the "Almost Compassionate" and the "Near Merciful", indicating that nobody is more than loving, empathetic and chivalrous than God. The Qur'an refers to God as being "full of loving kindness."

The Qur'an exhorts Muslim believers to treat all people, those who have non persecuted them, with birr or "deep kindness" every bit stated in Surah [Quran 6:eight-ix]. Birr is also used past the Qur'an in describing the love and kindness that children must evidence to their parents.

Ishq, or divine love, is the emphasis of Sufism in the Islamic tradition. Practitioners of Sufism believe that dear is a projection of the essence of God to the universe. God desires to recognize beauty, and every bit if i looks at a mirror to run into oneself, God "looks" at himself within the dynamics of nature. Since everything is a reflection of God, the schoolhouse of Sufism practices seeing the beauty within the apparently ugly. Sufism is often referred to as the religion of love.[56] God in Sufism is referred to in three main terms, which are the Lover, Loved, and Dearest, with the concluding of these terms being oft seen in Sufi poetry. A common viewpoint of Sufism is that through dearest, humankind tin can go back to its inherent purity and grace. The saints of Sufism are infamous for being "drunk" due to their dear of God; hence, the constant reference to wine in Sufi poetry and music.

Bahá'í Faith

In his Paris Talks, `Abdu'l-Bahá described four types of love: the honey that flows from God to human beings; the dear that flows from human beings to God; the dearest of God towards the Cocky or Identity of God; and the dearest of human beings for human beings.[57]

Indian

Buddhism

In Buddhism, Kāma is sensuous, sexual dearest. It is an obstacle on the path to enlightenment, since information technology is selfish. Karuṇā is pity and mercy, which reduces the suffering of others. It is complementary to wisdom and is necessary for enlightenment. Adveṣa and mettā are benevolent love. This love is unconditional and requires considerable self-acceptance. This is quite different from ordinary love, which is commonly about zipper and sex and which rarely occurs without self-interest. Instead, in Buddhism it refers to disengagement and unselfish interest in others' welfare.

The Bodhisattva platonic in Mahayana Buddhism involves the complete renunciation of oneself in lodge to accept on the brunt of a suffering world.

Hinduism

In Hinduism, kāma is pleasurable, sexual dearest, personified by the god Kamadeva. For many Hindu schools, it is the third end (Kama) in life. Kamadeva is often pictured belongings a bow of sugar cane and an pointer of flowers; he may ride upon a great parrot. He is usually accompanied by his consort Rati and his companion Vasanta, lord of the spring flavour. Stone images of Kamadeva and Rati can be seen on the door of the Chennakeshava temple at Belur, in Karnataka, Republic of india. Maara is another proper noun for kāma.

In contrast to kāma, prema – or prem – refers to elevated love. Karuna is compassion and mercy, which impels one to assistance reduce the suffering of others. Bhakti is a Sanskrit term, pregnant "loving devotion to the supreme God." A person who practices bhakti is called a bhakta. Hindu writers, theologians, and philosophers have distinguished 9 forms of bhakti, which tin can be found in the Bhagavata Purana and works by Tulsidas. The philosophical work Narada Bhakti Sutras, written past an unknown writer (presumed to be Narada), distinguishes eleven forms of dearest.

In sure Vaishnava sects within Hinduism, attaining unadulterated, unconditional and incessant dear for Godhead is considered the foremost goal of life. Gaudiya Vaishnavas who worship Krishna as the Supreme Personality of Godhead and the cause of all causes consider Love for Godhead (Prema) to deed in two ways: sambhoga and vipralambha (union and separation)—two opposites.[58]

In the status of separation, there is an astute yearning for being with the dearest and in the condition of matrimony, there is supreme happiness and nectarean. Gaudiya Vaishnavas consider that Krishna-prema (Love for Godhead) is non fire but that it still burns away one's material desires. They consider that Kṛṣṇa-prema is not a weapon, but it nevertheless pierces the heart. It is not water, simply information technology washes away everything—one'due south pride, religious rules, and 1'southward shyness. Krishna-prema is considered to make one drown in the ocean of transcendental ecstasy and pleasure. The beloved of Radha, a cowherd girl, for Krishna is oft cited every bit the supreme case of love for Godhead by Gaudiya Vaishnavas. Radha is considered to be the internal potency of Krishna, and is the supreme lover of Godhead. Her example of beloved is considered to be beyond the understanding of material realm as it surpasses any form of selfish love or lust that is visible in the material world. The reciprocal love between Radha (the supreme lover) and Krishna (God as the Supremely Loved) is the subject of many poetic compositions in India such every bit the Gita Govinda and Hari Bhakti Shuddhodhaya.

In the Bhakti tradition inside Hinduism, it is believed that execution of devotional service to God leads to the evolution of Love for God (taiche bhakti-phale krsne prema upajaya), and as honey for God increases in the center, the more than one becomes free from cloth contagion (krishna-prema asvada haile, bhava nasa paya). Being perfectly in love with God or Krishna makes ane perfectly gratuitous from material contamination. and this is the ultimate way of salvation or liberation. In this tradition, salvation or liberation is considered junior to love, and just an incidental by-product. Existence absorbed in Dear for God is considered to be the perfection of life.[59]

Political views

Complimentary beloved

The term "free love" has been used[60] to describe a social movement that rejects marriage, which is seen as a form of social bondage. The Gratuitous Love motility's initial goal was to split the state from sexual matters such as union, nativity command, and adultery. It claimed that such issues were the business organisation of the people involved, and no one else.[61]

Many people in the early 19th century believed that spousal relationship was an important aspect of life to "fulfill earthly human happiness." Middle-class Americans wanted the abode to be a place of stability in an uncertain globe. This mentality created a vision of strongly divers gender roles, which provoked the advancement of the free love motility equally a contrast.[62]

The term "sexual activity radical" has been used interchangeably with the term "complimentary lover".[ citation needed ] Past whatsoever name, advocates had two strong beliefs: opposition to the idea of forceful sexual activity in a human relationship and advancement for a woman to use her trunk in any way that she pleases.[63] These are also beliefs of Feminism.[64]

Philosophical views

The philosophy of beloved is a field of social philosophy and ethics that attempts to explain the nature of dear.[65] The philosophical investigation of dear includes the tasks of distinguishing betwixt the various kinds of personal dearest, asking if and how love is or can exist justified, asking what the value of love is, and what touch dear has on the autonomy of both the lover and the dearest.[64]

Come across also

  • Color wheel theory of love
  • Man bonding
  • Love at first sight
  • Pair bond
  • Polyamory
  • Romance (dearest)
  • Self-dear
  • Social connection
  • Traditional forms, Afraid, Philia, Philautia, Storge, Eros: Greek terms for dear
  • Human relationship Science

References

  1. ^ "Definition of Love in English". Oxford English language Dictionary. Archived from the original on 2 May 2018. Retrieved 1 May 2018.
  2. ^ "Definition of "Dear" - English Lexicon". Cambridge English language Lexicon. Archived from the original on 2 May 2018. Retrieved 1 May 2018.
  3. ^ Oxford Illustrated American Dictionary (1998)
  4. ^ "Definition of LOVE". Definition of Love by Merriam-Webster. 27 December 1987. Retrieved xxx September 2021.
  5. ^ Roget's Thesaurus (1998) p. 592 and p. 639
  6. ^ "Love – Definition of love by Merriam-Webster". merriam-webster.com. Archived from the original on 12 January 2012. Retrieved fourteen December 2011.
  7. ^ Fromm, Erich; The Fine art of Loving, Harper Perennial (1956), Original English Version, ISBN 978-0-06-095828-2
  8. ^ "Article On Dearest". Archived from the original on 30 May 2012. Retrieved 13 September 2011.
  9. ^ Helen Fisher. Why Nosotros Dear: the nature and chemistry of romantic love. 2004.
  10. ^ "What Is Love? A Philosophy of Life". HuffPost. 5 December 2014. Retrieved 2 Oct 2020.
  11. ^ Liddell and Scott: φιλία Archived iii Jan 2022 at the Wayback Machine
  12. ^ Mascaró, Juan (2003). The Bhagavad Gita. Penguin Classics. Penguin. ISBN978-0-14-044918-1. (J. Mascaró, translator)
  13. ^ Anders Nygren, Agape and Eros.
  14. ^ Kay, Paul; Kempton, Willett (March 1984). "What is the Sapir–Whorf Hypothesis?". American Anthropologist. New Series. 86 (1): 65–79. doi:ten.1525/aa.1984.86.1.02a00050.
  15. ^ "Aboriginal Honey Verse". Archived from the original on 30 September 2007.
  16. ^ a b "St. Thomas Aquinas, STh I–II, 26, 4, corp. art". Newadvent.org. Archived from the original on nine November 2011. Retrieved 30 Oct 2010.
  17. ^ Leibniz, Gottfried. "Confessio philosophi". Wikisource edition. Archived from the original on 27 Apr 2009. Retrieved 25 March 2009.
  18. ^ Baba, Meher (1995). Discourses. Myrtle Beach: Sheriar Press. p. 113. ISBN 978-1-880619-09-4.
  19. ^ What is love?. In The Volume of Real Answers to Everything! Archived 16 January 2013 at the Wayback Machine Griffith, J. 2011. ISBN 978-1-74129-007-iii.
  20. ^ a b c d e Fromm, Erich; The Fine art of Loving, Harper Perennial (5 September 2000), Original English Version, ISBN 978-0-06-095828-2
  21. ^ DiscoveryHealth. "Paraphilia". Archived from the original on 12 Dec 2007. Retrieved 16 Dec 2007.
  22. ^ a b Lewis, Thomas; Amini, F.; Lannon, R. (2000). A General Theory of Love. Random House. ISBN978-0-375-70922-vii.
  23. ^ a b "Archived re-create" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 June 2011. Retrieved 3 October 2011. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as championship (link) Defining the Brain Systems of Animalism, Romantic Allure, and Zipper by Fisher et al.
  24. ^ a b Winston, Robert (2004). Human being. Smithsonian Establishment. ISBN978-0-03-093780-4.
  25. ^ Emanuele, East.; Polliti, P.; Bianchi, M.; Minoretti, P.; Bertona, M.; Geroldi, D. (2005). "Raised plasma nerve growth factor levels associated with early-stage romantic love". Psychoneuroendocrinology. 31 (iii): 288–294. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.09.002. PMID 16289361. S2CID 18497668. Archived from the original on half-dozen Dec 2006. Retrieved three December 2006.
  26. ^ Sternberg, R.J. (1986). "A triangular theory of love". Psychological Review. 93 (two): 119–135. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.93.ii.119.
  27. ^ Rubin, Zick (1970). "Measurement of Romantic Love". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 16 (two): 265–273. CiteSeerX10.one.one.452.3207. doi:ten.1037/h0029841. PMID 5479131.
  28. ^ Rubin, Zick (1973). Liking and Loving: an invitation to social psychology . New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. ISBN9780030830037.
  29. ^ Berscheid, Ellen; Walster, Elaine H. (1969). Interpersonal Attraction. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. ISBN978-0-201-00560-8. CCCN 69-17443.
  30. ^ Peck, Scott (1978). The Road Less Traveled. Simon & Schuster. p. 169. ISBN978-0-671-25067-6.
  31. ^ Loye, David South. (2000). Darwin'due south Lost Theory of Dearest: A Healing Vision for the 21st Century. iUniverse. p. 332. ISBN978-0-595-00131-6.
  32. ^ The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, edited past David M. Osculation, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005. Affiliate 14, Commitment, Beloved, and Mate Retention by Lorne Campbell and Bruce J. Ellis.
  33. ^ a b c Michod, R.Eastward. (1989). What's love got to practise with it? The solution to 1 of evolution's greatest riddles. The Sciences, May/June, 22-27. DOI:ten.1002/j.2326-1951.1989.tb02156.x
  34. ^ C. Due south. Lewis, The Iv Loves, 1960.
  35. ^ Kristeller, Paul Oskar (1980). Renaissance Thought and the Arts: Collected Essays. Princeton Academy Press. ISBN978-0-691-02010-5.
  36. ^ Stendhal, in his book On Dearest ("De 50'amour"; Paris, 1822), distinguished carnal honey, passionate dear, a kind of uncommitted love that he called "taste-love", and love of vanity. Denis de Rougemont in his volume Beloved in the Western World traced the story of passionate love (50'amour-passion) from its ladylike to its romantic forms. Benjamin Péret, in the introduction to his Anthology of Sublime Dearest (Paris, 1956), further identified "sublime dearest", a land of realized idealisation perhaps equatable with the romantic form of passionate beloved.
  37. ^ a b c d Anders Theodor Samuel Nygren, Eros and Agape (first published in Swedish, 1930–1936).
  38. ^ "Philosophy of Love | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy". www.iep.utm.edu. Archived from the original on 29 Baronial 2017. Retrieved 24 August 2017.
  39. ^ Thomas Köves-Zulauf, Reden und Schweigen, Munich, 1972.
  40. ^ JFK Miller, "Why the Chinese Don't Say I Dearest You lot Archived 24 January 2010 at the Wayback Machine"
  41. ^ a b c d e Ryang, Sonia (2006). Love in Mod Japan: Its Estrangement from Self, Sexual activity and Society. Routledge. pp. 13–14. ISBN978-i-135-98863-0. Archived from the original on xi July 2016. Retrieved 3 February 2016.
  42. ^ a b c d Abe, Namiko. "Japanese Words for "Honey": The Deviation between "Ai" and "Koi"". About.com. Archived from the original on five November 2014. Retrieved 5 Nov 2014.
  43. ^ Monier Williams, काम, kāma Archived 19 Oct 2022 at the Wayback Car Monier-Williams Sanskrit English Lexicon, p. 271, see third column
  44. ^ James Lochtefeld (2002), The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Hinduism, Volume 1, Rosen Publishing, New York, ISBN 0-8239-2287-1, p. 340
  45. ^ See:
    • Kate Morris (2011), The Illustrated Dictionary of History, ISBN 978-81-89093-37-ii, p. 124;
    • Robert Eastward. Van Voorst, RELG: World, Wadsworth, ISBN 978-1-111-72620-1, p. 78
  46. ^ R. Prasad (2008), History of Scientific discipline, Philosophy and Culture in Indian Civilisation, Volume 12, Part one, ISBN 978-81-8069-544-5, pp. 249–270
  47. ^ Rig Veda Book ten Hymn 129 Archived 16 February 2022 at the Wayback Machine Verse 4
  48. ^ Ralph Griffith (Translator, 1895), The Hymns of the Rig veda Archived x April 2022 at the Wayback Machine, Book 10, Hymn CXXIX, Poetry 4, p. 575
  49. ^ Wolpe, David (sixteen February 2016). "We Are Defining Love the Incorrect Manner". Time. Archived from the original on 26 February 2019. Retrieved 14 Feb 2019.
  50. ^ a b Pope Benedict XVI. "papal encyclical, Deus Caritas Est". Archived from the original on viii October 2011. Retrieved xi June 2008.
  51. ^ Woo, B. Hoon (2013). "Augustine's Hermeneutics and Homiletics in De doctrina christiana". Journal of Christian Philosophy. 17: 97–117.
  52. ^ "Sri Lanka – Philippines: Meeting with the young people in the sports field of Santo Tomas University (Manila, 18 Jan 2015) – Francis". w2.vatican.va. Archived from the original on 23 Feb 2018. Retrieved 24 February 2018.
  53. ^ Nidoy, Raul (13 February 2015). "The key to love according to Pope Francis". Archived from the original on 24 February 2018. Retrieved 24 Feb 2018.
  54. ^ Jesus and the adult female taken in infidelity
  55. ^ Swartley, Willard M. (1992). The Beloved of Enemy and Nonretaliation in the New Testament, Studies in peace and scripture; (Equally Scapulam I) cited by Hans Haas, Idee und Platonic de Feindesliebe in der ausserchristlichen Welt (Leipzig: University of Leipzig, 1927). Westminster John Knox Press. p. 24. ISBN978-0-664-25354-seven.
  56. ^ Lewisohn, Leonard (2014). Cambridge Companions to Organized religion. Cambridge: Cambridge Academy Press. pp. 150–180.
  57. ^ "Bahá'í Reference Library – Paris Talks". reference.bahai.org. pp. 179–181. Archived from the original on 20 Baronial 2014. Retrieved 4 September 2014.
  58. ^ Gour Govinda Swami. "Wonderful Characteristic of Krishna Prema, Gour Govinda Swami". Facebook. Archived from the original on 29 November 2012. Retrieved 7 Jan 2012.
  59. ^ A C Bhaktivedanta Swami. "Being Perfectly in Honey". Archived from the original on 23 November 2014. Retrieved 7 January 2012.
  60. ^ The Handbook Archived 13 June 2010 at the Wayback Machine of the Oneida Customs claims to have coined the term around 1850, and laments that its use was appropriated past socialists to assault spousal relationship, an institution that they felt protected women and children from abandonment
  61. ^ McElroy, Wendy (1996). "The Complimentary Love Motion and Radical Individualism". Libertarian Enterprise. 19: 1.
  62. ^ Spurlock, John C. Costless Love Marriage and Middle-Class Radicalism in America. New York, NY: New York UP, 1988.
  63. ^ Passet, Joanne E. Sex Radicals and the Quest for Women'southward Equality. Chicago: U of Illinois P, 2003.
  64. ^ a b Laurie, Timothy; Stark, Hannah (2017), "Love'southward Lessons: Intimacy, Pedagogy and Political Community", Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 22 (four): 69–79, doi:10.1080/0969725x.2017.1406048, S2CID 149182610
  65. ^ Soren Kierkegaard. Works of Love.

Sources

  • Chadwick, Henry (1998). Saint Augustine Confessions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-283372-3.
  • Fisher, Helen (2004). Why We Love: the Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Honey. New York : H. Holt. ISBN978-0-8050-6913-6.
  • Giles, James (1994). "A theory of love and sexual desire". Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 24 (four): 339–357. doi:ten.1111/j.1468-5914.1994.tb00259.x.
  • Kierkegaard, Søren (2009). Works of Honey. New York City: Harper Perennial Modern Classics. ISBN978-0-06-171327-9.
  • Oord, Thomas Jay (2010). Defining Love: A Philosophical, Scientific, and Theological Engagement. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos. ISBN978-1-58743-257-6.
  • Singer, Irving (1966). The Nature of Love. Vol. (in three volumes) (five.1 reprinted and later volumes from The Academy of Chicago Printing, 1984 ed.). Random House. ISBN978-0-226-76094-0.
  • Sternberg, R.J. (1986). "A triangular theory of love". Psychological Review. 93 (2): 119–135. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.119.
  • Sternberg, R.J. (1987). "Liking versus loving: A comparative evaluation of theories". Psychological Bulletin. 102 (3): 331–345. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.102.3.331.
  • Tennov, Dorothy (1979). Love and Limerence: the Experience of Beingness in Love. New York: Stein and Day. ISBN978-0-8128-6134-1.
  • Forest Samuel E., Ellen Forest and Denise Boyd (2005). The Globe of Psychology (fifth ed.). Pearson Teaching. pp. 402–403. ISBN978-0-205-35868-seven.

Further reading

  • Bayer, A, ed. (2008). Art and love in Renaissance Italy. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Fine art.

External links

  • History of Love, Net Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • Friendship at Curlie
  • Philanthropy at Curlie
  • Romance at Curlie

kirkpatrickournothe86.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love

0 Response to "To Say I Love You Is Something Else Again Image"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel